Page 3 of 8

Re: World's Challenging Approaches -3 |NZQN|02-08-2017|16:00Z

Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 10:45 am
by V12
I flew approach 32 (VOR/DME C) with manual VOR interception 1 nm before AFTON for turn radius reduction.

Re: World's Challenging Approaches -3 |NZQN|02-08-2017|16:00Z

Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 11:46 am
by KL-666
Just watched the video of the gamer landing in an earier post:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sInOI0HqCQ

That approach is utter rubbish. Especially that insane circling between the mountains just before the runway. If you unnecessarily endanger your plane like that, you can turn any airport in the most dangerous airport. That guy is lucky he does not have a license, so it can not be taken away from him.

Here is how the 260 degrees approach is done IRL. Just sail the plane straight in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNCQlCgb0SQ

Generally it is better to fare on IRL videos instead of some gamers fantasies.

Kind regards, Vincent

Re: World's Challenging Approaches -3 |NZQN|02-08-2017|16:00Z

Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 9:24 am
by V12
IMHO, it is not gamer's fantasy. He performed visual circling that is described in the approach plates :

Image

Re: World's Challenging Approaches -3 |NZQN|02-08-2017|16:00Z

Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 10:10 am
by KL-666
See, there is the difference with real aviation. Gamers blindly follow each and every single line they can find on a map, even if it is not a standard part of the approach. That circuit is depicted there for special purposes to know how not to hit a mountain when low circling is necessary. GA generally makes circuits, the circuit could be used for go-arounds or when the ATC needs more separation.

But it is definitely not part of the standard approach. Or do you want to say that each and every jetliner landing there daily is doing it wrong? And the ATC there is wrong? But the gamer is right?

Kind regards, Vincent.

Re: World's Challenging Approaches -3 |NZQN|02-08-2017|16:00Z

Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 10:50 am
by SHM
Earlier, the only approaches to Queenstown were VOR/DME approaches with 5.4%+ gradients, which also required a circling manoeuver to be completed in a small valley North East of the field.

Nowadays, RNP approaches are used which don't require circling.

But, we will be doing the circling (what's the challenge otherwise ;) )

Check this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EGYNjj7y3Q

Re: World's Challenging Approaches -3 |NZQN|02-08-2017|16:00Z

Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 11:20 am
by KL-666
That film depicts a valid use of the circuit. If you approach from the "wrong" end of the runway, then turning around is inevitable.

Btw. That pilot was approaching over the part of the lake before the bend. There is no line drawn there on any map. Naughty pilot! :-) Or is there more to flying than senselessly following lines?

Kind regards, Vincent

Re: World's Challenging Approaches -3 |NZQN|02-08-2017|16:00Z

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2017 7:54 pm
by V12
SHM wrote:But, we will be doing the circling (what's the challenge otherwise ;) )


I made circling. With Concorde and 200 KIAS not absolutly simple, but possible. Flight log at https://fgtracker.ml/modules/fgtracker/ ... ID=6934908

Re: World's Challenging Approaches -3 |NZQN|02-08-2017|16:00Z

Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 12:20 am
by KL-666
On the other forum i read about a top ace pilot called PavlinSierra. Maybe someone should bring this event to his attention. He might enjoy this challenge.

There is also a guy called Wecsje, who also seems to be an ace. He might enjoy this challenge too.

Kind regards, Vincent

Re: World's Challenging Approaches -3 |NZQN|02-08-2017|16:00Z

Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 2:28 am
by SHM
Wecsje is here
memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=201

You're mistaken about Pavlin. Don't judge him by his flight hours :P

Re: World's Challenging Approaches -3 |NZQN|02-08-2017|16:00Z

Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 3:14 am
by IAHM-COL
SHM wrote:
You're mistaken about Pavlin. Don't judge him by his flight hours :P


Ouch! Burn!