Angle of Attack is KING

bomber
Posts: 1379
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:40 pm

Angle of Attack is KING

Postby bomber » Fri May 27, 2016 12:06 pm

Understanding the angle of attack and what changes this be it the wing wash out/in, roll or yaw rate is an important part of flight modelling. Regardless of which method you're using.

This is an acceptable example of a planes lift derived through what I suspect is a datcom or areomatic approach.

Code: Select all

    <function name="aero/force/Lift_alpha">
      <description>Lift due to alpha</description>
      <product>
          <property>aero/qbar-psf</property>
          <property>metrics/Sw-sqft</property>
          <table>
            <independentVar lookup="row">aero/alpha-rad</independentVar>
            <tableData>
              -0.20 -0.4365
               0.00  0.2500
               0.23  1.0288
               0.60  0.5615
            </tableData>
          </table>
      </product>
    </function>


if however like me you've split the wing up into sections then you have to do this calculation for each section airfoil area taking into account any angle of attack variation due to washout and then just total all these values up.

An advantage of doing this is that knowing each sections lift you can calculate their roll moment... knowing the total wings lift you can calculate the wings centre of lift and roll moment.. this comes in handy later on.
"If anyone ever tells you anything about an aeroplane which is so bloody complicated you can't understand it, take it from me - it's all balls" - R J Mitchell

User avatar
legoboyvdlp
Posts: 1757
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2015 9:49 pm
Location: Venezuela

Re: Angle of Attack is KING

Postby legoboyvdlp » Fri May 27, 2016 12:26 pm

Regarding AOA, I was just thinking of what it means. If your nose is up and you are dropping, you probably need to shove your nose down, since you are in a deep stall. If you are pushing your nose down to a dive and climbing like a rocket... do you have negative AOA? I've been reading Ernest K Gaan's book 'Fate is the Hunter'. He was an American Airlines pilot in the days of DC-2's; he remembers one time entering a thunderstorm with Captain Ross, and seeing how Ross was pointing the nose at the ground... while climbing at 1500 feet per minute. He remembers that Ross ordered gear down, and remarks that if the gear were not down, the aircraft would be climbing a lot faster.
~~Legoboyvdlp~~
Maiquetia / Venezuela Custom Scenery
Hallo! Ich bin Jonathan.
Hey!
Avatar created by InSapphoWeTrust CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.p ... d=27409879

bomber
Posts: 1379
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: Angle of Attack is KING

Postby bomber » Fri May 27, 2016 1:49 pm

No you're not nesseccarily in a negative angle of attack..

The leading edge of a thunderstorm has a lot of fast upward moving air hiting the airfoil at a high AoA..if you're flying straight and level the resultant AoA is naturally not as a high as the rising air but it's neither zero. So to reduce AoA and lift you've got to point the nose into the airflow which would give the impression of a negative AoA but in reality isn't.
"If anyone ever tells you anything about an aeroplane which is so bloody complicated you can't understand it, take it from me - it's all balls" - R J Mitchell

bomber
Posts: 1379
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: Angle of Attack is KING

Postby bomber » Fri May 27, 2016 1:59 pm

Which brings up the AoA of the propwash hitting the wing..

Here's an example of propwash.. ok the dynamic pressure is increased by the thrust coefficient however the lift is being calculated as though it's hitting the airfoil/flap at alpha rad.

Code: Select all

    <function name="aero/force/Lift_propwash">
      <description>Delta lift due to propeller induced velocity</description>
      <product>
         <property>propulsion/engine[0]/thrust-coefficient</property>
          <property>aero/qbar-psf</property>
          <property>metrics/Sw-sqft</property>
          <table>
            <independentVar lookup="row">aero/alpha-rad</independentVar>
            <independentVar lookup="column">fcs/flap-pos-deg</independentVar>
            <tableData>
                     0.0     60.0
              -0.01  0.000   0.000
               0.00  0.003   0.007
               0.24  0.011   0.028
               0.48  0.000   0.000
            </tableData>
          </table>
      </product>
    </function>


If like me you've worked out the coefficients for the section of the wing that's within the radius of the propwash the lift for this section is the addition of the propwash lift at zero AoA based on prop induced velocity plus the lift for this section at it's current AoA based on dynamic pressure.
"If anyone ever tells you anything about an aeroplane which is so bloody complicated you can't understand it, take it from me - it's all balls" - R J Mitchell

bomber
Posts: 1379
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: Angle of Attack is KING

Postby bomber » Fri May 27, 2016 2:06 pm

And then there's these calculations

<function name="aero/force/Lift_pitch_rate">
<description>Lift_due_to_pitch_rate</description>
<product>
<property>aero/qbar-psf</property>
<property>metrics/Sw-sqft</property>
<property>velocities/q-aero-rad_sec</property>
<property>aero/ci2vel</property>
<value> 5.3514 </value>
</product>
</function>

<function name="aero/force/Lift_alpha_rate">
<description>Lift_due_to_alpha_rate</description>
<product>
<property>aero/qbar-psf</property>
<property>metrics/Sw-sqft</property>
<property>aero/alphadot-rad_sec</property>
<property>aero/ci2vel</property>
<value> 4.3685 </value>
</product>
</function>


I have no understanding of their worth.....
"If anyone ever tells you anything about an aeroplane which is so bloody complicated you can't understand it, take it from me - it's all balls" - R J Mitchell

bomber
Posts: 1379
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: Angle of Attack is KING

Postby bomber » Fri May 27, 2016 2:10 pm

this is the list due to flaps..

<function name="aero/force/Lift_flap">
<description>Delta Lift due to flaps</description>
<product>
<property>aero/qbar-psf</property>
<property>metrics/Sw-sqft</property>
<property>fcs/flap-pos-deg</property>
<value> 0.0123 </value>
</product>
</function>


however if you've calculated the flaps wing sections coefficients, it's already covered in your main wing lift calcs.
"If anyone ever tells you anything about an aeroplane which is so bloody complicated you can't understand it, take it from me - it's all balls" - R J Mitchell

bomber
Posts: 1379
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: Angle of Attack is KING

Postby bomber » Fri May 27, 2016 2:13 pm

And finally the h-stabs...

<function name="aero/force/Lift_elevator">
<description>Lift due to Elevator Deflection</description>
<product>
<property>aero/qbar-psf</property>
<property>metrics/Sw-sqft</property>
<property>fcs/elevator-pos-rad</property>
<value> 0.3929 </value>
</product>
</function>


But we know a planes h-stab area... and we can work out the co-effiecients of it as easily as we can the main wing so why not work it out accurately rather than using a rad number, the area of the wing and a 'magic number'....
"If anyone ever tells you anything about an aeroplane which is so bloody complicated you can't understand it, take it from me - it's all balls" - R J Mitchell

bomber
Posts: 1379
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: Angle of Attack is KING

Postby bomber » Fri May 27, 2016 5:47 pm

if angle of attack is king..... what does dihedral with changing beta angle do to alpha AoA ?
"If anyone ever tells you anything about an aeroplane which is so bloody complicated you can't understand it, take it from me - it's all balls" - R J Mitchell

User avatar
IAHM-COL
Posts: 6409
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:43 pm
Location: Homey, NV (KXTA) - U.S.A
Contact:

Re: Angle of Attack is KING

Postby IAHM-COL » Fri May 27, 2016 6:19 pm

Queen? Bishop? Rook? Knight?
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IAHM-COL/gpg-pubkey/master/pubkey.asc

R.M.S.
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it?

User avatar
jwocky
Site Admin
Posts: 1833
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 12:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Angle of Attack is KING

Postby jwocky » Fri May 27, 2016 8:52 pm

Oh oh ohhhh, a bit careful here, please ...

First of all, you can't just skip "lift due to flaps" and just assume it is in the main lift ... because there are two different things to keep in mind with flaps (and some other dynamic things)

1.) They go in and out ... obviously. Means, they change dynamically their relevance in lift and drag. Which leads to the effect that is is really dynamic ... as in, the flaps move from one position to the other. Now imagine you have all this in your main lift routine. Every function is internally worked as kind of a little chukn of software inherently blocking other parts of the software from getting to work while this thing runs. So you really want to split it up in smaller chunks.
Another example for such effects (not aerodynamically, but software-wise) is a JSB-fuel system. Looks quite nice on the paper and the theory is so elegant. And of course it runs faster in JSB than it would run in an extra.Nasal module ... however, the cost in blocking core cycles are higher

2.) Aeromatics calculates flap lift and drag by an estimated "share" of the total wing area. Since in most planes the exact information is not available, that is based on an estimation by aeromatics and that one is usually not good. It gets worse, if you have planes for example with oversized flaps, like the A310. And because this is such a pain and you need to play around till you get the data points right (a certain VR and V1 at certain weights), I prefer to have the flaps, slats and spoilers separated to tweak them easier.

And yes, that's all about programming, your aerodynamics is of course impeccable.

And then, there is this "lift due to pitch" ... well, yeah, a lot of planes have that because it is an approximation because they have no "lift due to AoA" function. A certain AoA at a certain wind will lead always to a certain pitch at a given time t. They are not independent. So, since you went already with the AoA (you could because you did some extra miles on the math), the "lift due to pitch" would make only sense if it takes the aerodynamical behaviour of the fuselage in consideration. And I am not even sure if that wouldn't be also rather based on AoA since that is the angle to the wind. However, that would definitive put your plane development on a new level as far as FG is concerned.
Free speech can never be achieved by dictatorial measures!


Return to “JSBsim”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests