Re: Responding to Wllbragg
Posted: Wed May 18, 2016 12:54 am
Oh, and do not let you be persuadated by your master Curt in private mails. Make your own choice for once, man.
Kind regards, Vincent
Kind regards, Vincent
An independent forum for FlightGear users and developers
https://thejabberwocky.net/
Bugman wrote:Rather than repeat most in full, I'll point back in this thread to: viewtopic.php?f=85&t=29559&start=240. It's pretty simple, why does Israel not set up FGMEMBERS to have different categories:This is very simple to change with the current design of FGMEMBERS. It would take me less than 2 hours to do With this, there will be the ability to fully automate mirror synchronisation via scripts (e.g. hourly cron jobs to very quickly mirror the changes). This goes against Israel's goal of replacing the core content infrastructure, but it does significantly improve the goals of content distribution and zero-barrier development. So why not do this? All points of conflict and resentment will then be gone.
- FGAddon mirror with no development.
- 3rd party hangar mirrors - one category for each - and no development.
- Zero-barrier development repositories as new aircraft or forks of the above.
- Encouraging new aircraft developers to contact the original aircraft authors, and help them upstream (in FGAddon or the 3rd party hangar), to hopefully form a development team around the original author. The upstream changes will then flow into the mirrors, and down into any forks.
Regards,
Edward
Edit: Here is a hint - set up FGMEMBERS aircraft to have submodules inside submodules. Then there could be a master FGMEMBERS-AIRCRAFT with the submodules FGMEMBERS-FGADDON, FGMEMBERS-PAF, FGMEMBERS-FGUK, FGMEMBERS-DEVEL, etc.
1. FGAddon mirror with no development.
2. 3rd party hangar mirrors - one category for each - and no development.
3. Zero-barrier development repositories as new aircraft or forks of the above.
4. Encouraging new aircraft developers to contact the original aircraft authors, and help them upstream (in FGAddon or the 3rd party hangar), to hopefully form a development team around the original author. The upstream changes will then flow into the mirrors, and down into any forks.
bomber wrote:Then we can see what else they moan about.... eventually people will see the spoilt brats that they are...whilst looking at Fgmember and seeing people willing to compromise and give concessions