say again?
1. terrasync has KHAF flooded
2. terraGIT forks flooded KHAF
3. terraGIT fixes the flood on KHAF overuling the "you can patch terrain" blockade
4. terrasync fixes KHAF, after that, with better landclasses (source unkown/undistributed)
5. terraGIT takes terrasync improvements
Currently, using terraGIT and terrasync in KSFO is no different content. It does not mean that TS has been better all along. Ultimately for terraGIT does not matter, as we ship the better content. If the content in Terrasync is improved, and better, well terraGIT will take that content. It's good for us
All I am saying is that the fact that terrasync fixed the KHAF issue way after terrasync, proofs a couple of things:
1. the terrain can be fixed. They are willing to ignore the problem with continental patching everyonce in a while...
2. I dont know how they judge if its ok here, but not there. If the rule is :no continental patch: then this fix on KSFO must not be applied
(but again, they were kind of forced out of the correctives applied in terraGIT
3. So, again my call on this is that we (the FG community) benefit additionally of terraGIT in the sense that we make the developers and maintainers of terrasync more prone to make improvements instead of sitting of the content unimproved for too long.
Without a terraGIT, I doubt, they would have changed their posture of
":nothing can be done to fix this or that until WS3 comes"
Well... no they had proof they can. Just it seems all along this time they just did not want to.
I am sorry, to be a voice of dissent, and to push them to do a better job. But not really. I am glad, they are moving along, and doing a better job, now.