KSFO

Talking about the core development, vent steam ... censoring free but no guarantee, "they" will listen.
User avatar
Catalanoic
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2015 11:33 am

Re: KSFO

Postby Catalanoic » Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:14 pm

Is the second shot (KHAF?) with osm-pylons? Check the mid-right side of the shot.

User avatar
LesterBoffo
Posts: 766
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 3:58 am
Location: Beautiful sunny, KOTH

Re: KSFO

Postby LesterBoffo » Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:19 pm

SHM wrote:What happened to their policy of we don't patch scenery unless its an island! :roll:


You know after reading about the mailing listed FG initializing problem with Mac users, and the latest nightly, that involved someone substituting 'curly quotes' for 'straight quotes', nothing ever surprises me any more about what kind of bolloxing can be done at the coding level in this sim.

Nope, just another day in the Wild West Show known as FlightGear. :lol:

User avatar
IAHM-COL
Posts: 6409
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:43 pm
Location: Homey, NV (KXTA) - U.S.A
Contact:

Re: KSFO

Postby IAHM-COL » Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:36 pm

those are not OSM2city objects, Catalanoic
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IAHM-COL/gpg-pubkey/master/pubkey.asc

R.M.S.
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it?

D-ECHO
Posts: 436
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 10:55 am

Re: KSFO

Postby D-ECHO » Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:41 pm

So what is the advantage of Terragit in this area? There are disadvantages but you see it as an advantage that TS has been better and is now forked by you? Don't understand the world anymore.

KL-666
Posts: 1610
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 8:42 am

Re: KSFO

Postby KL-666 » Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:49 pm

Have you been smoking something again d-echo? Else you could see that:

1) Terrasync people say rigorously: we do not accept changes in the grounds around airports.
2) Next other people say, fine, then we do it in terragit
3) Suddenly now point 1) is happening in terrasync.

So terrasync people have learned. That is a positive in my book.

Kind regards, Vincent

D-ECHO
Posts: 436
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 10:55 am

Re: KSFO

Postby D-ECHO » Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:52 pm

Smoking is gooooood. Nope just kidding. But if terrasync is better now how is that an advantage of Terragit?

D-ECHO
Posts: 436
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 10:55 am

Re: KSFO

Postby D-ECHO » Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:52 pm

Btw iahm have you seen my post about licensing?

User avatar
IAHM-COL
Posts: 6409
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:43 pm
Location: Homey, NV (KXTA) - U.S.A
Contact:

Re: KSFO

Postby IAHM-COL » Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:53 pm

say again?

1. terrasync has KHAF flooded
2. terraGIT forks flooded KHAF
3. terraGIT fixes the flood on KHAF overuling the "you can patch terrain" blockade
4. terrasync fixes KHAF, after that, with better landclasses (source unkown/undistributed)
5. terraGIT takes terrasync improvements

Currently, using terraGIT and terrasync in KSFO is no different content. It does not mean that TS has been better all along. Ultimately for terraGIT does not matter, as we ship the better content. If the content in Terrasync is improved, and better, well terraGIT will take that content. It's good for us :)

All I am saying is that the fact that terrasync fixed the KHAF issue way after terrasync, proofs a couple of things:

1. the terrain can be fixed. They are willing to ignore the problem with continental patching everyonce in a while...
2. I dont know how they judge if its ok here, but not there. If the rule is :no continental patch: then this fix on KSFO must not be applied
(but again, they were kind of forced out of the correctives applied in terraGIT
3. So, again my call on this is that we (the FG community) benefit additionally of terraGIT in the sense that we make the developers and maintainers of terrasync more prone to make improvements instead of sitting of the content unimproved for too long.

Without a terraGIT, I doubt, they would have changed their posture of
":nothing can be done to fix this or that until WS3 comes"

Well... no they had proof they can. Just it seems all along this time they just did not want to.

I am sorry, to be a voice of dissent, and to push them to do a better job. But not really. I am glad, they are moving along, and doing a better job, now.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IAHM-COL/gpg-pubkey/master/pubkey.asc

R.M.S.
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it?

User avatar
IAHM-COL
Posts: 6409
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:43 pm
Location: Homey, NV (KXTA) - U.S.A
Contact:

Re: KSFO

Postby IAHM-COL » Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:55 pm

D-ECHO wrote: Nope just kidding.

Agreed. You are just being snarky, and ignore logic and reasoning
But if terrasync is better now how is that an advantage of Terragit?


Like in KSFO? terrasync is not better than terraGIT right now. They have identical contents.

OK. I'll agree with you, terrasync content looks much better elsewhere, too.
I'll leave with that. It does not translate that I cant have terraGIT thou.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IAHM-COL/gpg-pubkey/master/pubkey.asc

R.M.S.
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it?

User avatar
IAHM-COL
Posts: 6409
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:43 pm
Location: Homey, NV (KXTA) - U.S.A
Contact:

Re: KSFO

Postby IAHM-COL » Sat Oct 01, 2016 4:56 pm

D-ECHO wrote:Btw iahm have you seen my post about licensing?

No I did not...

Oh wait the aircrafts without license. Sure I saw it.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IAHM-COL/gpg-pubkey/master/pubkey.asc

R.M.S.
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it?


Return to “Core Development”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests