Free Flight, Free Speech

Lol But jomo knows use well, and he knew would take is a joke. I doubt he would tell a noon pilot that. And I have been reading the whole thread. It amuses me how immature everyone is acting. The situation is over. Why do you keep giving a shit about a problem that is over? Kind Regards, Josh Why d...

Would a professional ATC suggest that the pilot shuts down the plane's engines to lose altitude and lower speed more quickly? It was *CLEARLY* a joke! How can you be so clueless? Try to follow the discussion before you comment. Otherwise you just look like you're taking sides because you're protect...

You sound like you suffer from manic depression or bipolar disorder or something.

Go see a shrink.

Thanks for your interpretation of the facts again, Lydiot. @SHM I am very fine with it if you want to discuss something in a respectful manner. But wrongly trying to add another case to the account of Jomo only, where there have been many mistakes on behalf of the pilot too, does not seem very resp...

Good question! I'll post it to the other forum as well.

SHM wrote:Care to explain why its jomo always!
This isn't the first time.

I don't think Jomo will ever change, and i would normally not care. But in this case if nobody points out that Jomo was actually wrong young or new pilots might get the wrong idea and get turned off from multiplayer and FG.

The most provocative act i find the go around. As Oscar correctly pointed out: No professional pilot would do that without asking first "Do i have landing clearance?". Would a professional ATC suggest that the pilot shuts down the plane's engines to lose altitude and lower speed more quic...

(States that he deliberately does not want to fly to Charlie He didn't state that at all. He said he wanted to wait for his plane to lock onto the VOR. When it did he flew to Charlie. And again - you seem to ignore that Jomo later said he didn't care whether the following pilot flew CHA direct or f...

I actually think this description of events is far too biased. It's fine if you want to point out the mistakes that DLH made, but not at the expense of being neutral when doing it. So in my opinion, this is what's wrong with your description: You mean another case of a pilot neglecting about every i...

Btw. "Defending him" is not exactly a correct description. "Bringing perspective onto a very one-sided story" would be more correct. I don't really agree that the story is one-sided, but I do agree that "defending him" is probably not the best choice of words, and I al...